I know personally I find GAL to be slightly easier to work on, but beyond that I see no appreciable differences. I like Galaxy for traction and MCE for hydros. Not a huge fan of iBox, but admittedly have relatively less experience with newer MCE stuff. What is your take, especially those of you who may spend a lot of time working with these controllers.
For the most part agree. Unfortunately I have little experience with the Galaxy controllers. I have looked at two galaxy hydro's recently for a potential customer. The customer shared the other contractors work reports with me. I'm still not ready to offer any conclusion on the galaxy control units. But I will say I've always liked their equipment.
MCE has alway been reliable equipment for us. Their support is tough to get a hold of sometimes. But when I have called on them for support they have always given me a follow up call after the job was done.
I would like to point out a personal observation. There are over 1000s threads in this section of the forum. Now I know there are a lot more of the big 4 units out there!
But, I don't see a single thread for Virgina, ESI or CJ Anderson? Either they are to easy to fix. They have such a small part of the market. Or they are not breaking down...
I have a lot of Performa MCE on my routes before. Im not sure if Performa is still in production but these controller are about as good as you can get.
Swift is still my preference. The recorder is worth in its weight in gold times a billion. Set up a cycle, set the trigger for the fault you want to capture and let it run. With that set up now you can go perform maintenance on other units. Also its really easy to set up all kinds of things for the customer in matter of minutes(up peak, down peak, lock/unlock floors, turn the cab lights off until a hall call is pressed saving energy).
I have worked on mce and gal but I have worked on more swifts and I have written software for them.
I can make a swift5000 run up and down hands free, view i/o's, velocity, and stop count.
I also can compare parameters saved on file with loaded values in the controllers.
demo:
http://www.firstchroniclesproductions.com/desk_top/swift_5000_errorcode_lookup.html
We like to install the serial link controllers, as they use less wires, no switches, and have car top and c.o.p. boards. You do not have to be in the machine room.
Has anyone had any experiance with the GAL hydro product? How does it compare price wise and installation wise to the motion 2000?
From what I have seen all the recent GAL AC traction controls come with KEB drives. They run great but I have had a lot of serial comm faults with them. I prefer the Magnetek drives...which you have to request.
And for hydros I prefer Virginia Controls MH3000. I have seen too many 2-3 stop GAL hydros get shut down overnight on serial comm faults (TOC can comm errors. SPB can comm errors, etc).
As a troubleshooter I prefer working on Futura's for traction elevators. The RVU is great and its nice having the Wizard.
Hope this helps.